Koliko gnilobe je v slovenskemu odvetništvu?

The author examines a case involving attorney Tjaša Andree Prosenc and her client Federico Pignatelli. The piece questions whether citizens can trust the Slovenian legal system and the attorneys they hire.

The narrative centers on alleged fraudulent actions where Prosenc allegedly used falsified documents to register Pignatelli's mother instead of him as the legitimate company representative in the business register, despite clear notarized evidence showing Pignatelli and his brother Luigi as the only authorized partners.

When the Bar Association's disciplinary committee heard the case, Prosenc defended herself by claiming her intent was merely to "align formal status with actual conditions." She suggested Doris Mayer was always the true owner. However, Mayer testified under oath that she never authorized such actions and was shocked to learn Prosenc had submitted documents unrelated to the denationalization proceedings for which she held power of attorney.

The author questions how the Bar Association could accept the existence of parallel realities—official documentation versus "actual conditions"—and whether this reflects corruption among senior legal professionals. The piece criticizes the bar association's protective stance toward its members and calls for moral reform within Slovenian legal practice.